Typical and atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli bacterial translocation associated with tissue hypoperfusion in rats

Although enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) are well-recognized diarrheal agents, their ability to translocate and cause extraintestinal alterations is not known. We investigated whether a typical EPEC (tEPEC) and an atypical EPEC (aEPEC) strain translocate and cause microcirculation injury under conditions of intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Bacterial translocation (BT) was induced in female Wistar-EPM rats (200-250 g) by oroduodenal catheterization and inoculation of 10 mL 10(10) colony forming unit (CFU)/mL, with the bacteria being confined between the duodenum and ileum with ligatures. After 2 h, mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), liver and spleen were cultured for translocated bacteria and BT-related microcirculation changes were monitored in mesenteric and abdominal organs by intravital microscopy and laser Doppler flow, respectively. tEPEC (N = 11) and aEPEC (N = 11) were recovered from MLN (100 percent), spleen (36.4 and 45.5 percent), and liver (45.5 and 72.7 percent) of the animals, respectively. Recovery of the positive control E. coli R-6 (N = 6) was 100 percent for all compartments. Bacteria were not recovered from extraintestinal sites of controls inoculated with non-pathogenic E. coli strains HB101 (N = 6) and HS (N = 10), or saline. Mesenteric microcirculation injuries were detected with both EPEC strains, but only aEPEC was similar to E. coli R-6 with regard to systemic tissue hypoperfusion. In conclusion, overgrowth of certain aEPEC strains may lead to BT and impairment of the microcirculation in systemic organs.

Use of plasmid profiles to differentiate strains withi9n specific serotypes of classical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli

The usefulness of plasmid profile analysis to differentiate strains of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) was evaluated by studying 123 strains of the most prevalent serotypes causing infant diarrhea in the city of Säo Paulo, Brazil, i. e.,0111ab:H-, 0111ab:H2 and 0119:H6. No common profiles were found among strains of distinct serotypes. However, within each serotype, most of the strains were grouped within a few major profiles. More than 68% of the strainsof serotypes 0111ab:H- and 0111ab:H2 were included in 6 and 9 major profiles, respectively. In 0119:H6, abouth 48% of the strainswere included in 3 major profiles. This analysis suggewsts that only a few EPEC clones are causing infant diarrhea in Säo Paulo and revealed that the distribution of serotypes 0111 ab:H- and 0111ab:H2 during the one-year study was at least partly determined by small outbreaks of the most common profiles. We conclude that plasmid profile analysis is very useful to differentiate strasins within specific EPEC serotypes